上海细胞库
人源细胞系| 稳转细胞系| 基因敲除株| 基因点突变细胞株| 基因过表达细胞株| 重组细胞系| 猪的细胞系| 马细胞系| 兔的细胞系| 犬的细胞系| 山羊的细胞系| 鱼的细胞系| 猴的细胞系| 仓鼠的细胞系| 狗的细胞系| 牛的细胞| 大鼠细胞系| 小鼠细胞系| 其他细胞系|
人源细胞系| 稳转细胞系| 基因敲除株| 基因点突变细胞株| 基因过表达细胞株| 重组细胞系| 猪的细胞系| 马细胞系| 兔的细胞系| 犬的细胞系| 山羊的细胞系| 鱼的细胞系| 猴的细胞系| 仓鼠的细胞系| 狗的细胞系| 牛的细胞| 大鼠细胞系| 小鼠细胞系| 其他细胞系|
| 规格 | 价格 | 库存 |
|---|---|---|
| 50µg | ￥ 1484 | 1 |
FC - Quality tested
ELISA Detection - Reported in the literature, not verified in house
Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by ELISA assay and/or immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For ELISA detection applications, a concentration range of 0.125-0.5 ?g/ml is recommended. To obtain a linear standard curve, serial dilutions of TNF R Type II/p75 recombinant protein ranging from 250 to 4 pg/ml are recommended for each ELISA plate. For flow cytometric staining, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤ 0.5 ?g per 106 cells in 100 ?l volume or 100 ?l of whole blood. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.
Flow Cytometry: For most successful immunofluorescent staining results, it may be important to maximize signal over background by using a relatively bright fluorochrome-antibody conjugate or by using a high sensitivity, three-layer staining technique (e.g., including a biotinylated antibody (Cat. No. 113204) or biotinylated anti-Armenian hamster IgG second step (Cat. No. 405501), followed by SAv-PE (Cat. No. 405204)).
ELISA Detection1: The biotinylated TR75-32.4 antibody is useful as a detection antibody when paired with the Purified TR75-54.7 antibody (Cat. No. 113303/113304) as the capture antibody.
Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include: immunofluorescent staining, immunoprecipitation1 and receptor blocking1. The Ultra-LEAF? Purified antibody (Endotoxin <0.01 EU/?g, Azide-Free, 0.2 ?m filtered) is recommended for functional assays (Cat. No. 113205 & 113206).
Variety of cell types at low levels
1. Aggarwal BB, et al. 1985. Nature 318 665.
2. Chan FKM, et al. 2000. Science 288:2351.
3. Loetscher H, et al. 1990. Cell 61:351.
4. Rothe J, et al. 1993. Nature 364:798.
